according to the team, digital rectal exams may be falling short because the tissue in the prostate, particularly in young men, may be too slight for detection by a finger. also, depending on the part of the prostate affected, evidence of the disease may simply be hard to reach.
“early stage cancer may not have the size and stiffness to be palpable,” said peter albers, senior author of the study and a urologist at düsseldorf university. “separate analysis that used mri scans before biopsies to locate cancers in the prostate showed that about 80 per cent of these are in an area that should be easy to reach with a finger and still cancers were not detectable by dre.”
psa and mri may be a more effective screening protocol
prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer in canada — and number one among men — with an estimated 24,600 people receiving a diagnosis in 2022,according to the canadian cancer society. around 4,600 men were expected to have succumbed to the disease last year.eight provinces and three territories cover the cost of the
psa testby referral without requiring symptoms, except ontario and british columbia.
the team hopes the glaring discrepancy in detection methods will encourage screening programs use a combination of psa testing and mri scans instead of dre. the switch may be appealing to men for other reasons.
“if the aim of a screening program is to pick up cancers as early as possible and the current screening tool isn’t doing that job, then that is a fundamental failure of that approach,” albers said. “we speculate in our paper that not only is the dre not useful for detecting cancer but it may also be one reason why people don’t come to screening visits — the examination probably puts a lot of men off.
“in germany, for example, the participation rate is less than 20 per cent in the screening program for men 45 to 50 years. if we were to offer psa testing instead, more of them might be willing to come.”