why the 80/20 split is a slow death
the medical community is currently obsessed with “percentage splits”—the portion of billings a doctor keeps versus what they pay the clinic for overhead. the popular 80/20 model is often a death knell for quality care. to make those numbers work, you have to strip a clinic to the studs.
nursing teams are cut, minor procedure rooms are shuttered because sterilization is too expensive and administrative burdens shift back to the doctor, who ends up charting until midnight instead of seeing patients.
at my clinic, callingwood crossing, we use a 70/30 split. that 30 per cent isn’t profit; it’s an investment in ai tools, billing experts, and onsite diagnostics. this support allows physicians to actually be physicians. when we starve the infrastructure, we starve the care.
a dereliction of duty
under the medical profession act, the ama has a duty to represent all physicians. yet, when apccoa met with ama leadership, they claimed a “conflict of interest” in representing both clinic owners and associates. this is a distinction without a difference. you cannot have primary care medicine without a place to practice it.
by refusing to advocate for a dedicated infrastructure funding stream, similar to what hospitals and surgical centres receive, the ama is failing the very foundation of the system. their recent programs have bypassed clinics entirely, pitting colleagues against each other and forcing owners to absorb massive financial losses.
the stakes for albertans
between one and two million albertans no longer have a family doctor. this isn’t just a matter of convenience; it is a matter of life and death. the evidence is overwhelming: albertans with a regular family physician live longer, have lower rates of cancer and heart disease, and stay out of overcrowded emergency rooms.