from this, they determined that women who used assisted reproductive technology were seven years older on average than those who did not (35 vs. 28) and had more pre-existing health conditions, including chronic hypertension, diabetes and obesity. women using art were 2.5 times more likely to experience acute kidney damage and had a 65 per cent higher risk of developing arrhythmia (an irregular heartbeat).
art was also associated with increased odds of placental abruption (57 per cent), cesarean delivery (38 per cent) and preterm birth (26 per cent). these risks were evident even among women with no pre-existing cardiovascular risks. the hospital bill was, on average, $18,705 for those who used art and $11,983 for those who did not.
“we were surprised that assisted reproductive technology was independently associated with these complications, as opposed to being associated with only the existence of pre-existing health conditions or only among older women undergoing infertility treatment,” wu said.
it also lays bare the importance of discussing these risks with women considering using assisted reproductive technology. “especially patients with existing cardiovascular risk factors should be counselled about the potentially long-term cardiovascular implications and risks associated with art,” wu said. “it’s important for women to know that assisted reproductive technology carries a higher risk of pregnancy complications, which require close monitoring, particularly during delivery. primary and specialist health-care professionals should ensure these risks are communicated and strategies to mitigate them are discussed and implemented.”
the study was limited by its retrospective nature, meaning it relied on data that was compiled for reasons other than research and may be subject to some errors, including misdiagnosis or misclassification. according to wu, it also lays the groundwork for subsequent inquiry.