but that’s the thing about illness — it’s like an earthquake, the core of which begins with one person, but then causes seismic waves that spread outward, engulfing those who are connected to the person by love, or blood, or friendship or simply concern in varying degrees. in fact, some
experts have even described the fallout as “suffering” and “distress” culminating in
feelings of helplessness, lack of control, guilt, anger and worry.
we should be checking in on caregivers, not just patients
so if we know that close associations with someone who is ill, either as a caregiver, sibling, partner, or even as a member of the same family, can have such far-reaching consequences, are we doing all that we can to protect those who care about people who are facing health challenges? perhaps some of this responsibility lies with healthcare providers — making sure that inquiries about the health of the patient also include checking in on the well-being of the caregiver, the family, the child, or the friend. this means recognizing that often a person’s illness doesn’t happen in a silo — after all, as the bearded guy who was headed to nevada said, his wife wasn’t the only one living with cancer. he was too.
there’s something else, though. people who become the collateral damage of illness also need space — a safe place to leave the hard feelings and dark emotions like anger, fear, overwhelm, guilt, and the sense of unfairness that comes with being stuck with an enormous responsibility that they never signed up for. they need to know that it’s ok, normal, even, to feel all of these things and more importantly, feel able to talk about them without judgment and shame. certainly, that’s something our healthcare systems could do a better job of, making a concerted effort to wrap psychosocial care around those touched in some way by illness, and acknowledge the value of doing so. of course, this would need to be connected to a larger recognition that illness can have dire implications far beyond the person who is sick.