the quebec government seems ready to pay more money for less comprehensive care in order to provide the illusion of quicker access. but this further erodes the bedrock principle of family medicine, which is that one doctor should be responsible for a dedicated population. if doctors can bill more to see a stranger once for a single issue, it disincentivizes the hard work of taking on patients and caring for them throughout their lifetime. this might make the work of physicians easier — and it might explain why the fmoq is even tempted by such an overhaul. but this model is upside-down and backwards.
“it is destroying the fabric of family medicine, because family medicine is built on relationships,” kalin said. “the gap is the antithesis of that.
the gap is mcmedicine. it’s about fast-food delivery.”
dr. michael kalin, an outspoken critic of quebec’s health-care failings, says the suggestion of doing away with gps for a broad swath of the population risks “destroying the fabric of family medicine, because family medicine is built on relationships.”
allen mcinnis
/
montreal gazette files
adding insult to injury, the lack of continuity for patients and physicians also risks wasting money, scarce resources and precious time.
“the patients belong to no one. no one takes ownership. it’s never anybody’s responsibility. it’s always pushed off to the next person. it’s always somebody else’s problem,” he said. “we’re making this impersonal system where everybody is going to be calling call centres to be seen for problems that the agents don’t understand and can’t prioritize, sent to different sites each time where doctors don’t have the ability to access previous notes or records. we’re going to have redundancy, unnecessary testing, over-treatment, and i would say any study would suggest that the outcomes from this will be poor.”