raphael, a dual u.s.-israeli citizen, was similarly elated. “i think it’s a wonderful morning for the world. we’ve woken up to a new reality where we’ve seen one potential nuclear menace taken off of the map,” he told me amid the dim light.
having just returned from the united states, he understood that americans are “reticent” about getting entangled in another middle eastern “forever war.” however, he feels that this situation is different from iraq or afghanistan, because, this time, the goal is not to reconstruct a foreign nation, but only to de-fang an emerging nuclear state that could pose a “very credible threat to the west.”
he said that regime change is needed, characterizing the islamic republic as an “evil state that’s trapped the (iranian) people in tyranny.” like others in the shelter, he was unconcerned about iranian retribution, because jews have “survived many tougher ordeals over thousands of years” and “whatever they throw our way, we’ve seen worse before.”
the alarm ended soon after and life resumed. the day was hot and sunny. iran had launched
around 35 missiles that morning — far fewer than the hundreds that had been sent in the initial days of the war — but only three managed to land. at a nearby cafe, locals drank coffee and discussed the american strikes over pastries.