advertisement

'government's job to protect public health and safety,' says coalition opposed to expanding alcohol sales outlets in nova scotia

main photo
the nslc store on joseph howe drive in halifax on monday, july 14, 2025. ryan taplin / the chronicle herald
expanding public access to liquor in nova scotia might win some political points but the long-term cost will be paid in women’s shelters, hospitals, policing and people’s lives, says a group of concerned nova scotians.
“it is government’s job to protect the public’s health and safety,” the group, piloted by sue bookchin, executive director of the mahone bay-based be the peace institute, said in an open letter dated late last month.
“they (government) cannot shirk this responsibility.”
john lohr, the minister responsible for administering the liquor control act, said thursday that all sides of the issue will be considered.
“clearly, every voice matters,” lohr told reporters after a cabinet meeting. “i do care about social responsibility. we are hearing those voices but we also hear from people who think that it (alcohol) should be more readily available. all of those things will be filtered through that information process.”
the process began in late may, when the provincial government announced it was spending $300,000 to survey some 1,500 nova scotians and solicit feedback from 250 stakeholders about where alcohol could be sold in the province.
alcohol is currently sold at just over 300 retail locations, including nova scotia liquor corp. (nslc), corporate and agency stores, private wine and specialty stores, on-site stores at breweries and wineries, and farmers’ markets.
story continues below

advertisement

the public input portion of the process concluded june 30 and the provincial government is now in the process of collating and evaluating the response.
“we are reviewing our results and determining next steps,” a lohr spokeswoman said in an email monday but the government did not say how many public responses had been received.
“as soon as we have information to share, we’ll let nova scotians know.”

‘serious, even deadly’ situation

potential changes could include expanding retail options or allowing more places where people can drink alcoholic beverages.
signatories of the open letter, including survivor advocate groups for sexual violence and intimate partner violence, social workers, women’s centres, the mi’kmaq friendship centre and others, are concerned about potentially expanding alcohol access into grocery and convenience stores and other outlets.
“while this may sound like a move toward convenience or economic growth, it carries serious, even deadly consequences – especially for women, children, and marginalized communities already vulnerable to harm and with barriers to supportive services,” the open letter reads. 
“the evidence is overwhelming. increased alcohol access, specifically the number of outlets and the hours of availability, is directly correlated with an increase in harms from over-drinking – violence, injuries, sexual assault, illness, addictions, motor vehicle accidents and deaths.”
story continues below

advertisement

canadians have spent more on alcohol, cigarettes and cannabis during the pandemic. file photo - saltwire network
the letter writers say nova scotia already has one of the highest rates of heavy drinking in the country. 
“nova scotia is also largely rural where there are more licensed firearm owners, the rates of gender based violence are 75 per cent higher than the rate for urban women, particularly gun-related femicides, and higher rates of addiction.”
the letter says nova scotia also tops national statistics for police-reported intimate partner violence, sexual exploitation, and human trafficking.
“expanding access will only pour gas on an already raging fire. as colleagues and organizations working to end domestic, intimate partner, sexual and other forms of gendered violence, we are not against freedom or convenience. 
“but alcohol is not an ordinary product. it’s a known driver of many harms to our collective health, safety and well-being, including: domestic violence and homicides; high rates of sexual assaults on university campuses; persistently high incidents of fatal crashes; mental health and addiction issues and emergency room overcrowding.”

do we need more access?

the letter writers ask if nova scotians really need more and easier access to alcohol.
“we’ve seen this story before. provinces like newfoundland and new brunswick moved ahead without public health reviews, but nova scotia can choose a different path. 
story continues below

advertisement

“we urge the government to pause long enough to conduct a full, gendered, intersectional health impact assessment. include indigenous and african nova scotian voices. include survivor voices. tap the wealth of government public health experts and addiction specialists who are at the ready to compile the data. 
“protect the people who will bear the real cost of this decision. we don’t let people drive without seatbelts just because they want to. we regulate for safety and the public’s health, not popularity.”
nsgeu (nova scotia government and general employees union) had earlier delivered a robust response in opposition to any government plans to privatize alcohol sales in the province.
“the nslc contributes 100 per cent of their profits, over $280 million annually, to the province, which is used to fund many important public services like health care, education and new infrastructure,” nsgeu first vice-president hugh gillis said in a union news release in late june to launch an anti-privatization public awareness campaign.
“in these uncertain financial times why would the government look at doing something that would decrease revenue and put public services at risk,” gillis said.
story continues below

advertisement

the union represents employees who work in nslc stores and the nslc distribution centre. 
“the revenues through the process of the sale of alcohol are incredibly important to us, absolutely,” lohr said. “that’s a factor in anything that we will decide.
“the process is still underway and we haven’t made any decisions. when the decisions are made, part of that (nslc revenue) will be a factor in the decisions.”
francis campbell
francis campbell

i have worked as a reporter and editor in the daily newspaper industry for nearly four decades, reluctantly relinquishing the clay tablet some years ago to embrace more efficient and contemporary journalistic tools.

read more about the author

comments

postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. we ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. we have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. visit our community guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.