supplements certainly have their place, especially in travel-heavy, performance-focused lifestyles. but they’re meant to supplement, not replace, nutrient-rich food. and when used without individual assessment or guidance, they can mask deeper gaps or create new ones.
case for individualized guidance
the key takeaway isn’t that paracyclists are undernourished or careless. on the contrary, most are doing remarkably well within the limited framework they’ve been given. but that’s the problem: the framework isn’t built for them.
unlike able-bodied athletes, whose needs can often be predicted based on muscle mass, body weight, and general metabolic rate, para-athletes may experience wide variations in energy expenditure and nutrient needs based on the nature of their impairment. for instance, someone with a spinal cord injury may have lower calorie requirements but higher needs for specific nutrients that support muscle maintenance and immune function.
treating all athletes the same may seem fair, but it creates an uneven playing field in practice.
what’s needed is a shift from generalized best practices to individualized, evidence-informed nutrition strategies. these strategies must account for physical impairments, sport demands, and lifestyle realities—whether that means adjusted carbohydrate loading protocols, alternative hydration strategies, or new gut health and fibre intake approaches.
moving toward food first
the study also highlights a broader opportunity: to elevate food quality, not just quantity.
while supplements can plug gaps, real performance gains come from the foundation—whole grains, legumes, pulses, vegetables and minimally processed foods. these offer macro- and micronutrients, phytochemicals and fibre that support long-term health and day-to-day function.