and significantly, there were no negative impacts on the health or behaviour of the mice — no blood cell changes, no neurological changes, no cancers.
“this suggests that the treatment is not simply pausing aging, but actively turning it backwards,” the study notes, although it adds that “more research is needed to differentiate between the two.”
some predict it will happen in humans
computational biologist dr. andrew steele believes that this kind of technology will soon be used on humans.
“we’ve got the platform working in humans, and the concept working in mice,”
he told the uk’s inews. “i don’t think it’d be totally mad to see some reprogramming by rejuvenation in the next 10, 15, 20 years… you’d be a fool to bet against it working in the next 50 years.”
he suggests that it could happen by introducing new genes into existing human cells.
“we’re already using gene therapy in humans,” he told the outlet. “it’s in its infancy, but it’s existing technology. it feels like decades, rather than centuries, before we’re really good at it.”
jürg bähler, a geneticist at
university college london, agrees. “there’s been a huge increase in lifespan in the last 200 years, from 30 or 40 years to something like 80 now,” he said.
but he doesn’t think it makes sense for people to age beyond 150. “some people, including myself, would say there’s a natural ceiling for human life, about 150, and you can’t go beyond that,” he said.
steele has long believed that aging is the world’s most significant source of suffering — and that it’s preventable.
“ageing is this inevitable, creeping thing that happens. we’re all quite blind to its magnitude,”
he told the guardian in 2021. “but what do people die of? cancer. heart disease. stroke. these things all [primarily] occur in old people, and they primarily occur
because of the aging process.”